Category Archives: energy

Turnbull’s energy plan: lifeline or deadweight?

Posted on 31 October 2017 by Peter Boyer

The NEG is a dog of an idea, but it’s all we’ve got. Politics is winning hands down over policy in the endless battle for good government in Canberra. Already damaged by the chronic Turnbull-Abbott divide, last week the government … Continue reading →

Posted in agriculture and farming, Australian politics, batteries, carbon, carbon emissions and targets, carbon pricing scheme, climate politics, coal-fired, economic activity, economic restructuring, electricity networks, energy, forests and forestry, fossil fuels, gas-fired, hydro, land use, renewable energy, solar, wind | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Turnbull’s energy plan: lifeline or deadweight?

What price will we pay for a job?

Posted on 10 October 2017 by Peter Boyer

Politicians are exploiting economic insecurity to put public resources into highly-questionable ventures. No-one should underestimate the fear that accompanies the threat of being sacked, the dismay that comes with being unemployed, or the lengths to which people will go to … Continue reading →

Posted in Australian politics, Australian Youth Climate Coalition, business interests, business, investment, employment, carbon, carbon emissions and targets, Climate Action Hobart, climate politics, coal-fired, coastal management, community action, divestment, economic activity, energy, environmental degradation, forests and forestry, fossil fuels, growth, investment, land use, mining, public opinion, social and personal issues, social mindsets, Tasmanian politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on What price will we pay for a job?

James Delingpole’s game is everyone’s loss

Posted on 3 October 2017 by Peter Boyer

James Delingpole and friends aren’t interested in science, but that doesn’t stop them attacking it. It all started with some good news a fortnight ago, that a UK-based study had found the Paris “aspirational” climate goal of a 1.5C warming limit … Continue reading →

Posted in Australian politics, carbon, carbon emissions and targets, changes to climate, climate politics, climate sensitivity, contrarians, fossil fuels, future climate, international politics, modelling, renewable energy, scientific method, temperature | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on James Delingpole’s game is everyone’s loss