Category Archives: soil sequestration

Tim Flannery finds some silver linings

Posted on 29 September 2015 by Peter Boyer

Is there any light down that long dark tunnel? [29 September | Peter Boyer] Spring has sprung and life is full of promise. This is surely a season for hope. In Washington (where it’s autumn), a joint weekend statement by … Continue reading →

Posted in atmospheric science, business interests, business, investment, employment, carbon, carbon emissions and targets, carbon sequestration, changes to climate, climate politics, climate sensitivity, climate system, coal-fired, economic activity, economic restructuring, economic threat from climate, energy, fossil fuels, future climate, geoengineering, international politics, investment, science, soil sequestration, temperature | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Tim Flannery finds some silver linings

Hunt’s sleight-of-hand needs calling out

Posted on 28 April 2015 by Peter Boyer

Greg Hunt claims a “stunning” success for the ERF, but it’s far too early to tell [28 April 2015 | Peter Boyer] Remember Tony Abbott’s 2013 line about carbon trading – “a so-called market in the non-delivery of an invisible … Continue reading →

Posted in agriculture and farming, Australian politics, biological resources, carbon, carbon emissions and targets, carbon pricing scheme, carbon sequestration, carbon tax, climate politics, coal-fired, economic activity, electricity networks, emissions trading, energy, energy efficiency, forests and forestry, fossil fuels, land use, landfill, mining, renewable energy, soil sequestration, solar, trees | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Hunt’s sleight-of-hand needs calling out

Emission policy undermined by contrarian funding

Posted on 21 April 2015 by Peter Boyer

In the same week as its Emissions Reduction Fund gets its first workout, the Abbott government announced it would support a contrarian think-tank. [Peter Boyer | 21 April 2015] In this Gallipoli week we can be forgiven if we miss … Continue reading →

Posted in agriculture and farming, Australian politics, biological resources, built environment, bureaucracy, business, investment, employment, carbon, carbon emissions and targets, carbon pricing scheme, carbon sequestration, changes to climate, climate politics, climate sensitivity, climate system, coal-fired, contrarians, economic activity, economic restructuring, electricity networks, emissions trading, energy, energy conservation, energy efficiency, forests and forestry, fossil fuels, future climate, land use, landfill, leadership, renewable energy, science, soil sequestration, trees, waste | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Emission policy undermined by contrarian funding