Tag Archives: social mindsets

Orlando shows why reform is so hard

The trouble with terrorism is that it’s an excuse for not doing the hard stuff. The president said so, the presidential candidates said so, the FBI said so. It must be true. Orlando was an act of terror, a political … Continue reading

Posted in Australian politics, carbon pricing scheme, carbon tax, climate politics, community action, emissions trading, international politics, leadership, psychology, religion, social and personal issues, social mindsets | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Orlando shows why reform is so hard

Imagining the world ahead of us

The artist’s vision is an invaluable tool for comprehending what lies ahead [4 August 2015 | Peter Boyer] The 21st century, as one futurist website has it, will bring wondrous advances in medicine and energy but also economic hardship, resource … Continue reading

Posted in adaptation, agriculture and farming, biodiversity, biological resources, book reviews, changes to climate, climate system, education, energy, energy conservation, environmental degradation, forests and forestry, fossil fuels, future climate, governance, human behaviour, land use, mining, population, psychology, science, social and personal issues, social mindsets | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Imagining the world ahead of us

The climate debate: reason is not enough

People up against it find ways of expressing our common humanity [7 July 2015 | Peter Boyer] There’s a connection between the death of a football coach in Adelaide and racist shootings in a South Carolina church, and despite the … Continue reading

Posted in book reviews, climate politics, community action, contrarians, future climate, human behaviour, international politics, leadership, psychology, religion, science, scientific method, social and personal issues, social mindsets | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The climate debate: reason is not enough