Tag Archives: emissions trading

Labor recharges its climate policy but ditches a champion

Posted on 28 July 2015 by Peter Boyer

There’s a good chance that climate policy will determine the next election, but unfortunately Lisa Singh won’t get the reward she deserves. [28 July 2015 | Peter Boyer] The complaint at the weekend about Labor’s recharged climate policy, that we … Continue reading →

Posted in Antarctic, Australian politics, batteries, carbon, carbon emissions and targets, carbon pricing scheme, changes to climate, climate politics, climate system, economic activity, economic threat from climate, emissions trading, energy, fossil fuels, international politics, leadership, renewable energy, solar, wind | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Labor recharges its climate policy but ditches a champion

Hunt’s sleight-of-hand needs calling out

Posted on 28 April 2015 by Peter Boyer

Greg Hunt claims a “stunning” success for the ERF, but it’s far too early to tell [28 April 2015 | Peter Boyer] Remember Tony Abbott’s 2013 line about carbon trading – “a so-called market in the non-delivery of an invisible … Continue reading →

Posted in agriculture and farming, Australian politics, biological resources, carbon, carbon emissions and targets, carbon pricing scheme, carbon sequestration, carbon tax, climate politics, coal-fired, economic activity, electricity networks, emissions trading, energy, energy efficiency, forests and forestry, fossil fuels, land use, landfill, mining, renewable energy, soil sequestration, solar, trees | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Hunt’s sleight-of-hand needs calling out

Emission policy undermined by contrarian funding

Posted on 21 April 2015 by Peter Boyer

In the same week as its Emissions Reduction Fund gets its first workout, the Abbott government announced it would support a contrarian think-tank. [Peter Boyer | 21 April 2015] In this Gallipoli week we can be forgiven if we miss … Continue reading →

Posted in agriculture and farming, Australian politics, biological resources, built environment, bureaucracy, business, investment, employment, carbon, carbon emissions and targets, carbon pricing scheme, carbon sequestration, changes to climate, climate politics, climate sensitivity, climate system, coal-fired, contrarians, economic activity, economic restructuring, electricity networks, emissions trading, energy, energy conservation, energy efficiency, forests and forestry, fossil fuels, future climate, land use, landfill, leadership, renewable energy, science, soil sequestration, trees, waste | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Emission policy undermined by contrarian funding